“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after some distance they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not signify that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These types of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of final found.
one hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it is actually handy for the Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to produce an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got reached to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it has attained these types of stage. Read more
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as established forth would not use, as the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, fairly he continues to be acquitted with the criminal charges based on evidence and it can be well-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted from the criminal case, then on this really charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment via the department and held him disqualified for that post because acquittal for all foreseeable future purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been established at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan within the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
While there isn't any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds minor sway. Still, if there is no precedent in the home state, relevant case legislation from another state might be deemed by the court.
record from the department there isn't any record offered whatsoever regarding promotion on the petitioner(Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is additionally a properly-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could be just one or more judgments supplied (or reported). Only the reason to the decision of your majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all can be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may be adopted in an argument.
48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a chance of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a few of the relevant factors. Read more
Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common law, is usually a legislation that is based on precedents, that is definitely the judicial decisions from previous cases, relatively than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject matter to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules read more of the topic post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion could be considered, however, we're crystal clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject towards the approval on the competent authority.
The DCFS social worker in charge from the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-thirty day period report for the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to the person, by accomplishing an act which in the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death of the these types of person, is alleged to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed in an emergency foster home, and was later shifted all-around within the foster care system.